Name and Background
Baltasar Ebang Engonga Avomo follows Fang naming customs from Equatorial Guinea. His surname, Ebang, comes from his paternal lineage, while Engonga is his father’s surname and Avomo his mother’s surname, chosen respectively by each parent.
Personal Details
- Full Name: Baltasar Ebang Engonga Avomo
- Date of Birth: 15 March 1978 (Age: 46)
- Nationality: Equatorial Guinean
- Political Affiliation: PDGE
- Nickname: Bello
- Occupation: Politician
WAICH VIRAL LEAK BALTAZARR ENGONA
Baltasar Ebang Engonga Avomo is a former public official who served as the Director General of the National Agency for Financial Investigation (ANIF) in Equatorial Guinea. His primary role involved managing financial regulations and investigating financial crimes, including money laundering and corruption, to ensure compliance with national and international standards.
Ebang is a nephew of President Teodoro Obiang Nguema and belongs to one of Equatorial Guinea’s elite political families.
areer and Education
Ebang studied finance and economics at the University of Malabo, which laid the foundation for his career in public service. As the head of ANIF, he spearheaded efforts to strengthen financial oversight and enforce laws against financial misconduct. His work placed him at the forefront of Equatorial Guinea’s initiatives to maintain transparency in financial dealings and curb corruption.
Controversy
In 2024, Ebang became embroiled in legal and ethical controversies. Allegations of corruption and misconduct arose after explicit videos involving women connected to prominent figures were reportedly found on his personal computer. This discovery prompted an official investigation by local authorities and sparked significant public outcry.
On November 8, 2024, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema issued Decree No. 118, which formally removed Ebang from his position as Director General of ANIF and subjected him to a criminal investigation.
Public and Media Reaction
The allegations and subsequent investigation have stirred widespread debate in Equatorial Guinea, focusing on the ethical standards required of public officials. The case has drawn attention to broader governance challenges and the accountability of regulatory institutions.
As legal proceedings unfold, the controversy continues to dominate media coverage, raising questions about the integrity of Equatorial Guinea’s leadership and the effectiveness of its anti-corruption efforts.