ECG management referred to Attorney-General for prosecution over financial infractions

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament has referred the management of the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) to the Attorney-General’s Department for possible prosecution over what it described as gross financial indiscipline, budget overruns and breaches of the Public Financial Management Act.

At a sitting on Tuesday [Oct 28, 2025], the committee, chaired by the Member of Parliament for Komenda-Edina-Eguafo-Abrem, Samuel Atta-Mills, said its investigations had revealed widespread irregularities in ECG’s financial operations for 2023, involving expenditure far beyond approved limits without any board authorisation.

Financial infractions 

According to the committee, the company exceeded its approved budget in 13 expenditure items, resulting in an excess spending of GH¢189.2 million. 

Mr Atta-Mills said such financial recklessness warranted sanctions under the Public Financial Management Act, 2016 (Act 921), and directed that the officials involved be referred to the Attorney-General for prosecution.

“Those managers who were involved need to face the Attorney-General for prosecution. It’s as simple as that,” Mr Atta-Mills stated.

The committee expressed concern that ECG had spent beyond its means across multiple areas, including foreign training, cleaning, hotel accommodation, communication, consultancy, and publicity, without board approval.

Audit report 

The audit report presented to the committee showed that ECG budgeted GH¢21 million for foreign training but spent GH¢91 million.

Cleaning expenses rose from GH¢2.8 million to GH¢10.4 million, hotel expenses from GH¢9.3 million to GH¢12.2 million, and consultancy costs from GH¢40 million to GH¢58.6 million.

Stakeholder engagement expenses jumped from GH¢3.1 million to GH¢49 million, while publicity costs climbed from GH¢5.7 million to GH¢21.8 million.

Tariff adjustment 

The chairman of the committee described the figures as alarming and said the company’s management had violated financial regulations by committing funds without approval.

He added that such levels of inefficiency undermined ECG’s credibility and raised serious concerns about its continued calls for electricity tariff adjustments.

“If we manage our resources efficiently, there would be no need for continuous tariff increments. The citizens of Ghana cannot continue to bear the cost of inefficiency,” the chairman said.

The committee also uncovered that ECG failed to remit GH¢70.9 million in withholding taxes to the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) within the stipulated 14 days as required by law. Additionally, auditors found that ECG had underpaid State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and Independent Power Producers (IPPs) by GH¢1.29 billion under the Cash Waterfall Mechanism.

The chairman insisted that those  actions breached financial management laws and recommended that the Attorney-General investigate the matter further and take appropriate action.

ECG admits 

The acting Managing Director of ECG, Julius Kpekpena, admitted that the company had overspent in certain areas but explained that several corrective measures had since been implemented to tighten financial control.

He said part of the unremitted funds under the Cash Waterfall Mechanism had been used to pay contractors and purchase fuel for power generation, though he acknowledged that the decision was not in full compliance with the law.

“We are not saying that holding it was justified, but ECG used part of the funds to pay contractors and buy liquid fuel for generation,” he told the committee.

Mr Kpekpena added that since assuming office, management had ensured full compliance with the Cash Waterfall Mechanism, with all allocations now approved by the Energy Sector Committee.

“We have now instituted full compliance, and we are committed to preventing future irregularities,” he assured the committee.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.